Sumários

Climate Action and Public Policy - Knowledge and Institutional Innovation

29 Abril 2023, 09:00 João Morais Lavadinho Mourato

In this session we start from how the current form of global capitalism became ecologically and socially unsustainable. We examine how so much depends on a shift in human values. Human values can change; they are not natural laws. This session debates this value change. In society as a whole and in institucional settings in particular. The gateway to this debate is through the role of learning, the process through which information becomes knowledge. In fact the creation of knowledge in social networks is a key characteristic of the dynamics of culture. In the face of climate change challenges, and to thrive under conditions of accelerating change you have to be learning all the time. We look into how this is affected by the emergence of alt-knowledge and post-truth politics. We critically examine how knowledge brokerage is a fundamental part in helping public policy play a much needed role in shaping the directionality of sustainability transitions. 


Reading List

Adger, W. N., Dessai, S., Goulden, M., Hulme, M., Lorenzoni, I., Nelson, D. R., ... & Wreford, A. (2009). Are there social limits to adaptation to climate change?. Climatic change, 93(3-4), 335-354
Chapman, J. (2002). System failure: why governments must learn to think differently. Demos, London, UK. ISBN: 978-1-8418-0123-0 

Feola, G. (2014). Societal transformation in response to global environmental change: a review of emerging concepts. AMBIO, 4(5): 376–390. 

Göpel, M. 2016. The Great Mindshift. Vol. 2. Springer Verlag.

Kingdon, J.W. (1995). Agendas, alternatives, and public policies. 254pp. Longman, New York, USA. ISBN: 978-0-2050-0086-9 

Köhler, J., Geels, F. W., Kern, F., Markard, J., Onsongo, E., Wieczorek, A., … Wells, P. (2019). An agenda for sustainability transitions research: State of the art and future directions. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 31, 1–32.

Mourato, J., Bussler, A., & Wit, F. (2020). Interweaving knowledge systems through sustainability governance. Partnerships for the Goals. Encyclopedia of the UN Sustainable Development Goals, 1-12.

Mourato, J.M., de Wit, F. (2022). The Geography of Urban Sustainability Transitions: A Critical Review. In: Leal Filho, 

W., Vidal, D.G., Dinis, M.A.P., Dias, R.C. (eds) Sustainable Policies and Practices in Energy, Environment and Health Research. World Sustainability Series. Springer, Cham. 

O’Riordan, T., & Jordan, A. (1999). Institutions, climate change and cultural theory: towards a common analytical framework. Global Environmental Change, 9(2), 81-93.


Climate Action and Public Policy - Theory of Change - Transition Studies

22 Abril 2023, 09:00 João Morais Lavadinho Mourato

This session is an introduction to Transition Studies as the Theory of Change underpinning the ACOT's module approach. The core assumptions, concepts, analytical and methodological frameworks used are presented as well as an overview of the strengths and weaknesses of this conceptual approach. Particular attention is given to the concepts of prospective path dependency, transition pathways and lock-in mechanisms. 


Reading List

Frantzeskaki, N., Hölscher, K., Holman, I. P., Pedde, S., Jaeger, J., Kok, K., & Harrison, P. A. (2019). Transition pathways to sustainability in greater than 2 C climate futures of Europe. Regional environmental change, 19, 777-789.

Geels, F. W., & Schot, J. (2007). Typology of sociotechnical transition pathways. Research policy, 36(3), 399-417.

Grandin, J., & Sareen, S. (2020). What sticks? Ephemerality, permanence and local transition pathways. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 36, 72-82.

Hölscher, K., Wittmayer, J. M., & Loorbach, D. (2018). Transition versus transformation: What’s the difference?. Environmental innovation and societal transitions, 27, 1-3.

Loorbach, D., Frantzeskaki, N., & Avelino, F. (2017). Sustainability transitions research: transforming science and practice for societal change. Annual review of environment and resources, 42, 599-626.

Mathias, J. D., Anderies, J. M., Baggio, J., Hodbod, J., Huet, S., Janssen, M. A., ... & Schoon, M. (2020). Exploring non-linear transition pathways in social-ecological systems. Scientific reports, 10(1), 4136.

Seto, K. C., Davis, S. J., Mitchell, R. B., Stokes, E. C., Unruh, G., & Ürge-Vorsatz, D. (2016). Carbon lock-in: types, causes, and policy implications. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 41, 425-452.

Simoens, M. C., Leipold, S., & Fuenfschilling, L. (2022). Locked in unsustainability: Understanding lock-ins and their interactions using the case of food packaging. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 45, 14-29.

Sorrell, S. (2018). Explaining sociotechnical transitions: A critical realist perspective. Research Policy, 47(7), 1267-1282.

Runhaar, H., Fünfschilling, L., van den Pol-Van Dasselaar, A., Moors, E. H., Temmink, R., & Hekkert, M. (2020). Endogenous regime change: lessons from transition pathways in Dutch dairy farming. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 36, 137-150.

Wilson, G. A. (2014). Community resilience: path dependency, lock-in effects and transitional ruptures. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 57(1), 1-26.


Climate Action and Public Policy - Key Concepts and Issues

15 Abril 2023, 09:00 João Morais Lavadinho Mourato

This session breaks down a series of key concepts regarding the framing of public action and climate change. It addresses the need for a systemic view, what this means and how can we develop it. It also introduces climate action as a complex adaptive system that is peppered with the so called wicked problems, or super wicked problems. The session wraps up focusing on the changing nature of the future and how can we better positions ourselves to debate it. 


Reading List

Coyne, R. (2005). Wicked problems revisited. Design studies, 26(1), 5-17.

Head, B. W., & Alford, J. (2015). Wicked problems: Implications for public policy and management. Administration & society, 47(6), 711-739.

Levin, K., Cashore, B., Bernstein, S., & Auld, G. (2009). Playing it forward: Path dependency, progressive incrementalism, and the" Super Wicked" problem of global climate change. In IOP Conference Series. Earth and Environmental Science (Vol. 6, No. 50). IOP Publishing.

Levin, K., Cashore, B., Bernstein, S., & Auld, G. (2012). Overcoming the tragedy of super wicked problems: constraining our future selves to ameliorate global climate change. Policy sciences, 45, 123-152.
Lönngren, J., & Van Poeck, K. (2021). Wicked problems: A mapping review of the literature. International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology, 28(6), 481-502.

Peters, B. G. (2017). What is so wicked about wicked problems? A conceptual analysis and a research program. Policy and Society, 36(3), 385-396.

Kay, A. (2005). A critique of the use of path dependency in policy studies. Public administration, 83(3), 553-571.

Mahoney, J. (2000). Path dependence in historical sociology. Theory and society, 29(4), 507-548. 

Monat, J. P., & Gannon, T. F. (2015). What is systems thinking? A review of selected literature plus recommendations. American Journal of Systems Science, 4(1), 11-26.

Peters, B. G., Pierre, J., & King, D. S. (2005). The politics of path dependency: Political conflict in historical institutionalism. The journal of politics, 67(4), 1275-1300.

Peters, B. G. (2017). What is so wicked about wicked problems? A conceptual analysis and a research program. Policy and Society, 36(3), 385-396.

Rittel, H. W., & Webber, M. M. (1974). Wicked problems. Man-made Futures, 26(1), 272-280.

Williams, A., Kennedy, S., Philipp, F., & Whiteman, G. (2017). Systems thinking: A review of sustainability management research. Journal of Cleaner Production, 148, 866-881.


Key Challenges - Agroforestry

17 Março 2023, 14:00 João Morais Lavadinho Mourato

This session is parte of the Key territorial challenges that make up the first part of the ACOT Module. 
In this session we take a systemic view to the un-sustainability of the current global agroforestry through the lens of the evolution of global food production and consumption dynamics and its current key challenges. 

Reading List

Fagerholm, Nora, et al. "A systematic map of ecosystem services assessments around European agroforestry." Ecological Indicators 62 (2016): 47-65.

Godfray, H. C. J., Crute, I. R., Haddad, L., Lawrence, D., Muir, J. F., Nisbett, N., ... & Whiteley, R. (2010). The future of the global food system.

Mbow, Cheikh, et al. "Achieving mitigation and adaptation to climate change through sustainable agroforestry practices in Africa." Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability 6 (2014): 8-14.​

Mosquera-Losada, M. R., Santiago-Freijanes, J. J., Rois-Díaz, M., Moreno, G., den Herder, M., Aldrey-Vázquez, J. A., ... & Rigueiro-Rodríguez, A. (2018). Agroforestry in Europe: A land management policy tool to combat climate change. Land Use Policy, 78, 603-613.

Schoeneberger, Michele, et al. "Branching out: Agroforestry as a climate change mitigation and adaptation tool for agriculture." Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 67.5 (2012): 128A-136A.​

Seto, K. C., & Ramankutty, N. (2016). Hidden linkages between urbanization and food systems Science, 352(6288), 
943-945.

Springmann, M., Clark, M., Mason-D’Croz, D., Wiebe, K., Bodirsky, B. L., Lassaletta, L., ... & Willett, W. (2018). Options for keeping the food system within environmental limits. Nature, 562(7728), 519-525.

Verchot, L.V., Van Noordwijk, M., Kandji, S. et al. Climate change: linking adaptation and mitigation through agroforestry. Mitig Adapt Strat Glob Change 12, 901–918 (2007). 

Wilson, Matthew Heron, and Sarah Taylor Lovell. "Agroforestry—The next step in sustainable and resilient agriculture." Sustainability 8.6 (2016): 574.


Key Challenges - Urbanization

10 Março 2023, 18:00 João Morais Lavadinho Mourato

In this session we address Urbanization as one of the five key global territorial challenges that provide the contextual framework for ACOT. We stress a systemic perspective on how urbanization and sustainability intertwine at multiple level through the example of a growingly scarce resource worldwide - sand. 


Reading List

Anguelovski, I., & Carmin, J. (2011). Something borrowed, everything new: innovation and institutionalization in urban climate governance. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 3(3), 169–175

Brenner, N. (2013). Theses on urbanization. Public culture, 25(1 (69)), 85-114.

Broto, V. C. (2017). Energy landscapes and urban trajectories towards sustainability. Energy Policy, 108, 755-764.

Bulkeley, H., Carmin, J., Broto, V. C., Edwards, G. A., & Fuller, S. (2013). Climate justice and global cities: mapping the emerging discourses. Global Environmental Change, 23(5), 914-925.

Grandin, J., Haarstad, H., Kjærås, K., & Bouzarovski, S. (2018). The politics of rapid urban transformation. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 31, 16–22.

Henderson, J. V., Storeygard, A., & Deichmann, U. (2017). Has climate change driven urbanization in Africa?. Journal of development economics, 124, 60-82.

Jiang, L., & O’Neill, B. C. (2017). Global urbanization projections for the Shared Socioeconomic Pathways. Global Environmental Change, 42, 193-199.

Satterthwaite, D. (2009). The implications of population growth and urbanization for climate change. Environment and Urbanization, 21(2), 545–567.

Turner, W. R., Nakamura, T., & Dinetti, M. (2004). Global urbanization and the separation of humans from nature. Bioscience, 54(6), 585-590.